Case 4104615/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104615/2019 Mrs M McGladrigan v Glasgow City Council Cordia (Services) LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104615/2019
- Decision date
- 13 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104615/2019 Mrs M McGladrigan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that they had not been actively pursued, specifically rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant until 5 July 2023 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to address why the claims should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claims were struck out under rule 37 because they had not been actively pursued. The supplied listing categories identify Equal Pay Act, but the judgment text itself does not separately describe the substance of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims were struck out under rule 37 because they had not been actively pursued. The supplied listing categories identify Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text itself does not separately describe the substance of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.