Case 4104618/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104618/2024 Miss R McDougall v Structured House Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104618/2024
- Decision date
- 12 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104618/2024 Miss R McDougall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, following a notice and order dated 23 May 2024 under rule 28 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, no response was received from the respondent. On that basis, the response to the claim was dismissed.
In a rule 21 judgment dated 7 June 2024, the tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The judgment does not set out any disputed factual findings or substantive analysis beyond the rule 21 default procedure.
The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a hearing to be advised. No award figure is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment entered under rule 21 after no response was received to the rule 28 notice and order. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under rule 21 after no response was received to the rule 28 notice and order; described in the judgment as unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment entered under rule 21 after no response was received to the rule 28 notice and order; described in the judgment as unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 28 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.