Case 4104627/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Hania Zadruzynska v Mr Thom O’Donnell — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104627/2017
- Decision date
- 27 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Hania Zadruzynska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that it had jurisdiction under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to hear Miss Zadruzynska’s complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages. The judgment records that the hearing took place at Glasgow on 24 April 2018 before Employment Judge Shona MacLean, with the claimant appearing in person and neither respondent appearing or being represented.
The tribunal found that the claimant suffered unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in the sum of £6,556. It ordered the second respondent, Live Event Services Limited, to pay the claimant £6,556.
The claim insofar as directed against the first respondent, Mr Thom O’Donnell, was dismissed. The reasons were given orally at the hearing and no separate written reasoning beyond the recorded findings and award was provided in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to hear the complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages, found unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 in the sum of £6,556, and ordered the second respondent to pay that sum. The claim insofar as directed against the first respondent was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £6,556 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,556
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.