Case 4104636/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Marmac Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104636/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns Mr J Smeaton and 33 others in the attached schedule against Marmac Services Limited. On 16 June 2021 the claimant's representative told the Tribunal that an agreement had been reached with the respondent, that payment would be forthcoming, and that the claims could then be dismissed, but no confirmation of that position was provided within the promised 14 days.
The Tribunal later asked for an update on 7 July 2021 and again issued a reminder on 3 December 2021, but received no reply. On 3 February 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 17 February 2022 to provide written reasons or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out. No acceptable reason was given and no hearing was requested, so Employment Judge I McPherson struck out the claims under rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type; the case was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.