Case 4104636/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Karen Allan v ’s Husband Reface Scotland Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104636/2022
- Decision date
- 23 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Karen Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Glasgow on 20 and 21 June 2023, before Employment Judge Ian McPherson, the claimant's redundancy payment claim was withdrawn by her representative. The tribunal recorded that withdrawal under Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and then dismissed that part of the claim under Rule 52 on the respondents' application, which was not opposed.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the remaining heads of claim. It states that the other complaints, including unfair constructive dismissal, failure to pay notice pay and holiday pay, and failure to give written statement of employment particulars, were unaffected by the withdrawal and were to proceed as separately ordered at the continued final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant's redundancy payment claim was withdrawn by her representative at the final hearing. The tribunal then dismissed that part of the claim under Rule 52 on the respondents' unopposed application. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 51 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.