Case 4104640/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4104640/2018 Mrs G Osemwinyen v Represented by: Ms O Obi – Solicitor Aberdeenshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104640/2018
- Decision date
- 23 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4104640/2018 Mrs G Osemwinyen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs G Osemwinyen brought proceedings against Aberdeenshire Council under case number S/4104640/2018 at Aberdeen. The only substantive disposal recorded is that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.
As a result, Employment Judge Nicol Hosie dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits, any liability issues, or any remedy award.
The judgment is dated 18 January 2019 and was entered in the register on 23 January 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.