Case 4104641/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Adams & Others v (As per attached Schedule) Represented by:10 Priya Cunningham – Solicitor Land Engineering (In Administration) — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104641/2017
- Decision date
- 5 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Adams & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondents failed to comply with their duties to inform and consult with the claimants under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment records that the respondents were Land Engineering (In Administration), represented by Ernst & Young LLP, and that they were not present or represented at the hearing.
As a result, the tribunal made a protective award under section 189(2) of the same Act. The protected period was stated to begin on 31 May 2017 and to last for 90 days. The extracted judgment does not state a monetary total or any split between individual claimants.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award judgment under sections 188 and 189(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the judgment states a protected period beginning on 31 May 2017 for 90 days, but no monetary sum is set out in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189(2) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.