Case 4104647/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104647/2024 Mrs A Karlsone v Linnet Onboard Catering Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104647/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104647/2024 Mrs A Karlsone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response, so the Employment Judge decided the case on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £385.18 gross.
It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £315.10 gross. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £472.65 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £242.35 gross. The judgment stated that the respondent could deduct tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before paying the balance to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as £385.18 gross. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages awarded at £315.10 gross. | Upheld | — | £315 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £472.65 gross. | Upheld | — | £473 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as £242.35 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,415
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.