Case 4104658/2018 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104658/2018 Held in Glasgow on September 2018 Employment Judge: J D Young (sitting alone) Mr B Robertson v Jarvie Plant Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104658/2018
- Decision date
- 11 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge JD Young
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104658/2018 Held in Glasgow on September 2018 Employment Judge: J D Young (sitting alone) Mr B Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a disability discrimination claim arising from his dismissal on 23 February 2018. The tribunal treated the issue as a preliminary one and decided whether, at the relevant date, he met the definition of a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010. Employment Judge Young sat alone and heard evidence from the claimant and documents from the respondent, including medical records and a Fit for Work assessment.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had undergone major heart surgery in April 2017, including a triple coronary artery bypass, and that recovery could take time. It accepted that by February 2018 he may still have had some impairment in the sense that he had not fully recovered strength from the operation. The evidence included a consultant cardiologist letter stating that full recovery could take up to one year, and the tribunal noted that this could place him close to that period by the date of dismissal.
However, the tribunal was not satisfied that the impairment had a substantial adverse effect on normal day to day activities at the material time. It considered the claimant's evidence that he could not walk more than 100 metres without resting, found that evidence difficult to reconcile with the contemporaneous medical material, and noted the absence of complaints to the employer or GP in early 2018. It also relied on the Fit for Work assessment, the later medical follow-up showing no issues, and the claimant's own timesheets, which the tribunal thought did not support the level of limitation he described.
The tribunal therefore found that the claimant did not meet the definition of a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 and dismissed the claim. No remedy was awarded because the claim failed at the disability-status stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the claimant alleged discrimination under section 15 Equality Act 2010, but the tribunal held that he was not a disabled person within section 6(1) at the relevant time, 23 February 2018. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Equality Act 2010 section 6(1) and section 6(2)
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Pendragon Motor Company Limited t/a Stratstone (Wilmslow) Limited v Ridge EAT 962/00
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.