Case 4104677/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104677/2019 & 4105804/2017 Miss N Dodwell v Glasgow City Council Cordia Services LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104677/2019
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104677/2019 & 4105804/2017 Miss N Dodwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment in two linked cases, 4104677/2019 and 4105804/2017. On 12 June 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 July 2023, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claims should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore held that the claims had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and struck them out.
The judgment does not record any merits findings, liability findings, or monetary award. It is a procedural disposal only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Linked with case 4105804/2017; the judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Linked with case 4104677/2019; the judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.