Case 4104689/2024 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104689/2024 Mr A Naumowicz v Konnor R Kwapisz, trading as Relish It — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104689/2024
- Decision date
- 3 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster Employment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104689/2024 Mr A Naumowicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Sangster determined that the claimant, Mr A Naumowicz, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Konnor R Kwapisz trading as Relish It, to pay damages in the gross sum of £3,113.25, described in the judgment as six weeks' pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,669.92. The judgment records that the respondent was permitted to deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions from the gross sum awarded for notice pay if required by law to do so, provided the deducted sums were remitted to HMRC and written evidence of the deductions and remittance was provided to the claimant. The combined monetary total of the awards set out in the judgment is £7,783.17.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the gross sum of £3,113.25, described as six weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £3,113 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,669.92. | Upheld | — | £4,670 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,783
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,113
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.