Case 4104692/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Benjamin Singer v Tech Yard Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104692/2018
- Decision date
- 4 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Benjamin Singer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Tech Yard 5 Ltd presented no response to the claim. The claim form was sent to the respondent on 24 May 2018 and, although a response was due within 28 days, none was lodged by 21 June 2018 or at all. On the available material, the Employment Judge decided liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for February and March 2018 and ordered payment of £5,500. | Upheld | — | £5,500 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,750 in damages. | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,200. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,450
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.