Case 4104696/2020 · Employment Tribunal
15 Represented by:- Ms J Barnett, Consultant 20 Be Military Fit Ltd (in Company v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104696/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
1 namedClaimant
15 Represented by:- Ms J Barnett, Consultant 20 Be Military Fit Ltd (in Company
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 7 April 2021 before Employment Judge J D Young. The respondent, Be Military Fit Ltd (in Company Voluntary Arrangement), did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal noted that a supervisor, Hugh Jessiman, had been appointed on 17 November 2020 following the company's Company Voluntary Arrangement under the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy when the respondent encountered financial difficulty and discontinued its operations. The effective date of termination was 14 July 2020. Although the respondent had indicated that a redundancy payment would be made, none was paid. Using the claimant's age and 10 years' service, and applying the statutory cap on a week's pay from 6 April 2020 of £538.00, the tribunal calculated a redundancy payment of £8,070.00 under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had 9 days of holiday accrued but untaken at termination. On the figures provided, his net daily pay was £95.08, producing a holiday pay award of £855.72 under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, payable without deduction of income tax or NI contribution. The final judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed, although the reasons also note that the claimant had withdrawn that claim at the hearing in recognition of the respondent's status.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy when the respondent came under financial difficulty and discontinued operations. It calculated a redundancy payment of £8,070.00 using a statutory week's pay cap of £538.00, an effective date of termination of 14 July 2020, and a 15 multiplier based on age and 10 years' service. | Upheld | — | £8,070 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the claimant had 9 days of holiday accrued but untaken at termination and awarded £855.72 net under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, payable without deduction of income tax or NI contribution. | Upheld | — | £856 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. In the reasons, the tribunal also notes that at the hearing it was confirmed the claimant withdrew the unfair dismissal claim in recognition of the respondent's insolvency status, so the disposal is recorded in the judgment as dismissal but the reasons refer to withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,926
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.135 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- statutory cap on a week's pay
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.