Case 4104715/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Mowat v R T Management — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104715/2018
- Decision date
- 6 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Mowat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 22 May 2018, but the respondent did not enter a response within the 28-day period. The Employment Judge therefore determined liability on the available material without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaints succeeded. It awarded £1,372.83 for unauthorised deduction from wages, £758.36 for failure to provide written reasons for dismissal, calculated as two weeks at £379.18, and £1,372.83 for breach of contract, identified in the judgment as notice pay. The total award was £3,504.02.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,373 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. The judgment's wording also refers to failing to provide written reasons for dismissal in the same complaint description. | Upheld | — | £1,373 |
| Other | Failure to provide written reasons for dismissal; the judgment also repeats this phrase in the breach of contract description. | Upheld | — | £758 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,504
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.