Case 4104718/2018 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Mr S Jones v Represented by:- Munisa Malik - Solicitor L & M Survey Services Land & Mineral Survey Services Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104718/2018
- Decision date
- 6 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Mr S Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal held that the second respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the second respondent to pay £2,480.47 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the second respondent to pay damages of £1,585.22 for that breach.
The claim against the first respondent was dismissed. The hearing listed for 1 August 2018 was cancelled. The judgment does not set out further findings or a separate breakdown of the two sums beyond the individual awards recorded above.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the second respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,480.47. | Upheld | — | £2,480 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,585.22 against the second respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,585 |
| Other | The claim against the first respondent was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a separate legal label beyond that dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,066
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.