Case 4104731/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M McAvoy v Represented by: Mr J Flanagan - Solicitor Glasgow City Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104731/2017
- Decision date
- 19 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M McAvoy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis case called for a case management preliminary hearing on 19 February 2019. Before any discussion on the merits, Mr J Flanagan told the tribunal that he had instructions from the claimant to withdraw her claim. The tribunal clarified that the withdrawal was of the entire claim and that, in normal circumstances, withdrawal would be followed by dismissal.
Mr Flanagan confirmed that the claimant intended to withdraw her whole claim and understood that dismissal would follow. The respondents noted that position. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim in terms of Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Rules of Constitution & Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings were made on the substance of the pleaded claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant instructed her solicitor to withdraw her entire claim at a case management preliminary hearing. The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 after confirming the withdrawal was intentional and covered the whole claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.