Case 4104749/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104749/2017 Mr P King v Represented by: Mr R Lawson Solicitor Lothian Buses Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104749/2017
- Decision date
- 4 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jane Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104749/2017 Mr P King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment records a single procedural disposal only. It states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No merits findings, liability conclusions, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text. The judgment does not identify the underlying claims beyond the case listing, and it records no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
The judgment is dated 12 February 2019 and was entered in the register on 04 March 2019. It was copied to the parties after entry.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. No substantive claim type is identified in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.