Case 4104753/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Hood v Laigh Bent Leisure Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104753/2020
- Decision date
- 21 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Hood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response was presented by Laigh Bent Leisure Ltd, so Employment Judge Robert Gall determined the claim on the available material. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,206.68.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £571.42. The judgment records no separate award breakdown beyond those two sums. The judgment was dated 20 October 2020 and entered in the register on 21 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented to the claim. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,206.68. | Upheld | — | £2,207 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented to the claim. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £571.42. | Upheld | — | £571 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,778
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.