Case 4104754/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Cameron v Laigh Bent Leisure Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104754/2020
- Decision date
- 21 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Cameron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Robert Gall found that Laigh Bent Leisure Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,206.68 for the wages deduction and £571.42 for unpaid holiday entitlement. No separate breakdown beyond those two sums is recorded in the judgment, and no other heads of loss or remedy are mentioned.
The judgment was dated 20 October 2020 and entered in the register on 21 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,206.68. | Upheld | — | £2,207 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £571.42. | Upheld | — | £571 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,778
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.