Case 4104759/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Saktivel v Kamasutra Restaurant — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104759/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Young Sneha
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Saktivel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a waitress for the respondent from 20 January 2019 to 15 August 2019. After returning from a vacation in India on 24 September 2019, she said she could not obtain a response about shifts, payment, or a P45. She presented the tribunal claim on 7 September 2020 after ACAS early conciliation on 22 August 2020, and the respondent did not respond.
The tribunal held that the complaint was presented outside the three-month period beginning with 15 August 2019, but it accepted that it had not been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim earlier. It accepted her evidence that she did not know about Employment Tribunals or the ability to make such a claim until a colleague told her in August 2020, that she had come from a country without such a procedure, and that she acted promptly once she learned of it. The tribunal referred to section 23(2) and (4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Lowri Beck Services Limited v Brophy.
On the merits, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she had not taken any holiday in the year before 15 August 2019 and had not been paid holiday pay for leave due on termination. It accepted her calculation of 3.01 weeks' holiday pay at an average weekly pay of £98.39, giving £297.78, and also accepted that £94.00 was due in gratuities earned to the end of employment. The respondent was ordered to pay those sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found £297.78 due in respect of holidays accrued to the date of termination but not taken. | Upheld | — | £298 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded £94.00 for gratuities earned to the date of termination; it did not give this item a separate statutory heading, so it is mapped here to unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £94 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £392
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.23(2) and (4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- Lowri Beck Services Limited v Brophy [2019] EWCA Civ 2490
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.