Case 4104762/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Wilson v Keane Premier Healthcare Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104762/2024
- Decision date
- 20 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs P Wilson's representative withdrew on 18 September 2024. The Tribunal then wrote to the claimant on several occasions between 24 September and 22 November 2024 asking her to confirm whether she would represent herself or instruct a new representative, to respond to the respondent's objections to her amendment application, to confirm her availability for the final hearing, and to give written reasons or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The only response recorded was an email on 8 October 2024 saying she was instructing another lawyer; no further reply was received.
Employment Judge S MacLean struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records no findings on the merits of any substantive claim and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The reasons do not specify the underlying substantive heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.