Case 4104784/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104784/2016 Ms L Jeffrey v Represented by: Dallas McMillan Solicitors Falkirk Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104784/2016
- Decision date
- 10 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104784/2016 Ms L Jeffrey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a short judgment dated 10 July 2019, Employment Judge Frances Eccles recorded that Ms L Jeffrey's claim against Falkirk Council had been withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability and records no remedy or monetary award. It does not set out any factual dispute, legal analysis beyond the reference to Rule 52, or any findings against either party.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment text states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The substantive claim type is taken from the case context listing category of Equal Pay Act; the PDF text itself does not specify the underlying legal basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.