Case 4104785/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Craig Robertson v Red Lion Trading Limited (In Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104785/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Craig Robertson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 9 July 2021 before Employment Judge B Beyzade, the tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend the claim to include arrears of pay between 28 September 2020 and 22 November 2020 in the sum of £3,678.56 gross. That issue was not determined on the merits at this hearing; it was listed for a two-hour continued final hearing on the first open date after 7 September 2021, and the Secretary of State was added as a respondent because the proceedings may involve a payment out of the National Insurance Fund.
The claimant's claims for a redundancy payment, notice pay and holiday pay were withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The claimant's application to add claims of stress and defamation was refused because the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider those claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.