Case 4104786/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104786/2017 Mr I Birks v Represented by: Ms J Merchant - Solicitor Cromarty Firth Port Authority — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104786/2017
- Decision date
- 15 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104786/2017 Mr I Birks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is brief and records no substantive findings on liability. It identifies Mr I Birks as the claimant and Cromarty Firth Port Authority t/a Port of Cromarty Firth Limited as the respondent, with representation by Ms J Merchant for the claimant and Ms E L Grant for the respondent.
The only operative determination recorded is that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy, liability reasoning, witness evidence, or legal test is set out in the extracted judgment text. The judgment is dated 14 March 2019 and entered in the register on 15 March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.