Case 4104797/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104797/2020 Mr J Curley v Levelbrook Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104797/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104797/2020 Mr J Curley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment in which no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge L Wiseman decided the case on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 5 February 2021.
The tribunal found that Mr J Curley had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It therefore ordered Levelbrook Ltd to pay damages of £3,650.40.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,701.20. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,218.40.
The judgment records a total monetary outcome of £11,570.00 across the three awards. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claim was determined in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded in the sum of £3,650.40. | Upheld | — | £3,650 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,701.20. | Upheld | — | £6,701 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement; £1,218.40 was ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,218 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,570
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.