Case 4104801/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Carey v Get Roasted Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104801/2017
- Decision date
- 28 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Carey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent, Get Roasted Ltd. Employment Judge Frances Eccles determined the claim without a hearing on the merits and cancelled the hearing listed for 22 December 2017.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss G Carey's wages. It ordered payment of £440.62 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £187.50 for that claim. The extracted text includes an inconsistent parenthetical calculation, but the sum expressly ordered was £187.50.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £441 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and orders £187.50, but the parenthetical breakdown in the extracted text reads '(5 days x £187.50)', which appears internally inconsistent. The award amount itself is taken from the express sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £188 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £628
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.