Case 4104815/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McMahon v Tilly’s Hair & Beauty — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104815/2019
- Decision date
- 27 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McMahon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M McMahon appeared in person at Glasgow on 27 June 2019 and gave evidence with documents. Tilly’s Hair & Beauty did not lodge an ET3 and did not appear, so the case proceeded undefended. The tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence as credible and reliable.
The tribunal awarded £102 for wages due but unpaid. It accepted that this comprised four separate shortfalls: £30 due around New Year 2019, £36 for 1.5 hours worked on several occasions over a three-to-four week period, £16 for two extra hours worked on 12 March 2019, and £20 for a further underpayment also relating to 12 March 2019.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed without notice and was entitled to one week’s pay in lieu, assessed at £144. It also found that the relevant holiday year ran from January to December, that the claimant had accrued 7 days' leave by dismissal on 4 April 2019, and that after taking 4 days he had 3 days untaken leave, worth £168 on the basis of £8 per hour for 7 hours per day.
The tribunal awarded £22.40 for bank charges shown on the claimant’s bank statements as financial loss attributable to late or non-payment of sums due. It held that the claimant did not have two years’ service and was therefore unable to bring a claim of unfair dismissal, and it noted that no whistleblowing or discriminatory basis for dismissal was identified. The sums above were stated to comprise the claimant’s case.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant did not have two years' service and identified no whistleblowing or discriminatory basis for such a claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as wages due but not paid; the judgment broke this down into unpaid amounts of £30, £36, £16 and £20. | Upheld | — | £102 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as non-payment of notice pay; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice and entitled to one week's pay in lieu. | Upheld | — | £144 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 3 days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination, on the basis of a January-to-December holiday year. | Upheld | — | £168 |
| Other | Awarded as bank charges, described by the tribunal as financial loss attributable to late or non-payment of sums due. | Upheld | — | £22 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £436
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.