Case 4104825/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ramanjeet Dhillon v Now Brow (Clydebank) Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104825/2017
- Decision date
- 17 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ramanjeet Dhillon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter an ET3 response. The tribunal therefore made a Rule 21 judgment on the papers and held that the claimant's complaints of failure to pay holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. It ordered payment of £1,643.44 for holiday pay due and £1,513.00 for shortage of pay, both calculated from the claimant's Schedule of Loss lodged on 10 November 2017.
The remaining matters were not finally determined in this judgment. The tribunal listed the unfair dismissal complaint, the claim for a 25% statutory uplift for alleged non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice, and the harassment compensation claim for a final hearing. It noted that the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment and therefore appeared not to have qualifying service for an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, unless she could show a basis for automatically unfair dismissal.
The tribunal required further and better particulars of the automatic unfair dismissal case, the ACAS uplift basis, and the harassment claim, and directed the claimant to file an updated Schedule of Loss and supporting documents before the final hearing. It also observed that the claimant's Schedule of Loss referred to a total claimed award of £78,187.41, including a basic award of £270.13 and a compensatory award of £17,123.36, but those figures were not awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,643.44 for holiday pay due, based on the claimant's wage calculations attached to the Schedule of Loss. | Upheld | — | £1,643 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,513.00 for shortage of pay, based on the claimant's wage calculations attached to the Schedule of Loss. | Upheld | — | £1,513 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,156
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 29 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 92 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 76(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 124(1ZA) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.