Case 4104840/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G O’Brien v R Gilmour & Sons Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104840/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G O’Brien
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G O’Brien brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract arising from sums he said were due at the end of his employment, including holiday pay and pay in lieu of notice. The Tribunal found that his employment ended on 22 December 2017, that the primary time limit for either claim expired on 21 March 2018, and that because he had started ACAS Early Conciliation within time the extended limit expired on 21 April 2018. His ET1 was not lodged until April 2019, almost a year after that extended deadline.
The Tribunal accepted that the claimant had been caring for his father, who had terminal cancer, and that he had started a new job during that period. It nevertheless held that it was reasonably practicable for him to present the claims in time, because he had already contacted ACAS within the limitation period, had engaged with Early Conciliation, and knew there was a short time limit for lodging a tribunal claim. The Tribunal also noted that ignorance of the time limit would not normally provide a valid excuse.
Accordingly, the Tribunal held that both claims were presented outwith the relevant time limits under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994, declined to exercise its discretion to hear them out of time, and held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Presented out of time; the Tribunal held it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time and therefore the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Presented out of time; the Tribunal held it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time and therefore the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- reasonably practicable test
- s23(2) ERA 1996
- s23(4) ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.