Case 4104858/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Scales v Kingdom of sweets Ltd CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104858/2024
- Decision date
- 8 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Scales, was employed by Kingdom of Sweets Ltd at all material times. At the final hearing on 7 August 2024, held on the Cloud Video Platform, the respondent did not appear. Oral reasons were provided.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 11 June 2024. On that basis, it held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,844.
The tribunal also found that the respondent unlawfully deducted £12,121.42 net from the claimant's wages by failing to pay the wages to which he was entitled for January, February, March, April and May 2024. No separate interest or other remedy is recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 11 June 2024 and awarded a redundancy payment of £4,844. | Upheld | — | £4,844 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent unlawfully deducted £12,121.42 net from the claimant's wages by failing to pay wages for January, February, March, April and May 2024. | Upheld | — | £12,121 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,965
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.