Case 4104859/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K J M Senff v Represented by: Mr J Lawson - Solicitor Halfords Autocentres Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4104859/2024
- Decision date
- 18 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K J M Senff
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Aberdeen on 7 and 8 July 2025. The tribunal considered only whether Ms Senff met the definition of disability for Equality Act purposes, against the background of pleaded disability discrimination claims. It held that she had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of chronic colitis and/or an undiagnosed bowel or gastric problem during the relevant period from 30 October 2023 to 12 January 2024, and that her disability-based complaints would proceed to final hearing. No liability or remedy was decided in this judgment.
The tribunal accepted the claimant as a candid and credible witness. It found a history of recurrent lower abdominal pain from the age of 10, with the symptoms becoming more frequent and severe by late 2022 or early 2023. By that stage she was experiencing urgent toilet needs, faecal incontinence, weight loss, avoidance of eating and socialising, and anxiety about toilet access. The tribunal also accepted the medical evidence showing hospital admission on 10 October 2023 with acute and chronic colitis, and a gastroenterology review on 4 December 2023 when investigations were still ongoing.
The respondent pointed to gaps in the medical record and a September 2023 diagnosis of a urinary tract infection, but the tribunal did not accept that those matters showed the symptoms had ceased. It found that the claimant remained under investigation, that the condition had continued, and that the evidence supported ongoing abdominal pain, incontinence, disrupted sleep, restricted mobility, and difficulty with work and daily life. It therefore concluded that the impairment had a substantial effect on normal day-to-day activities and that the effect was long-term because it had been substantial from early 2023 and was likely to continue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability-status issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period and that disability-based complaints would proceed to final hearing; no liability or remedy was determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- substantial and long-term adverse effect
- normal day-to-day activities
- more than minor or trivial
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.