Case 4104863/2024 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104863/2024 Hearing by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) at Edinburgh on December 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Jamie Cochrane v Represented by Mr R Lawson Solicitor Satine Edinburgh Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4104863/2024
- Decision date
- 6 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104863/2024 Hearing by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) at Edinburgh on December 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Jamie Cochrane
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJamie Cochrane began work for Satine Edinburgh Ltd as Head Chef on 5 July 2023 under a permanent full-time contract on £35,000 per annum. The tribunal recorded that the employment ended in circumstances disputed by the parties. Mr Cochrane said he resigned by email on 25 November 2023 giving four weeks' notice; Ms Gillespie said he was dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal preferred Mr Cochrane's evidence, found Ms Gillespie's account inconsistent, and found that two letters said to invite him to disciplinary meetings had not been shown to have been received and could not be found to have been sent at the time.
The tribunal found that Mr Cochrane's employment ended when he resigned with notice on 25 November 2023, and that he continued to work until Ms Gillespie required him to hand in his keys and expenses card on 17 December 2023. It accepted that he should have been paid £2,916.67 gross for the period from 25 November to 23 December 2023, but he had been paid only £1,458.34 gross. The shortfall of £1,458.34 gross was therefore an unlawful deduction from wages, and the respondent was ordered to pay that sum subject to deduction of tax and national insurance.
The claimant's holiday pay claim had been withdrawn and dismissed before the hearing, so the tribunal did not determine that issue. It also rejected any ACAS Code uplift, holding that the claimant's grievance was raised after employment had ended and that an uplift would not be in the interests of justice on the facts found.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal treated the remaining claim as an unlawful deduction from wages claim covering notice pay and arrears of pay. The holiday pay claim was withdrawn and dismissed before the hearing. | Upheld | — | £1,458 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,458
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.