Case 4104881/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4104881/2018 Mr B Pirie v Represented by: Ms J Merchant - Solicitor TAQA Bratani Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104881/2018
- Decision date
- 20 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4104881/2018 Mr B Pirie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order. It records that the claimant, Mr B Pirie, represented by Ms J Merchant, had his claim dismissed because it had been withdrawn by him. The respondents were TAQA Bratani Limited, represented by Ms A Woods.
The tribunal did not make findings on the merits of any substantive claim. Its sole recorded decision was that, following withdrawal, the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy, award, or liability findings are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Nicol Hosie on 19 December 2018 and entered in the register on 20 December 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.