Case 4104886/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K MacKinnon v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104886/2014
- Decision date
- 13 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms K MacKinnon
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal in Glasgow, sitting before Employment Judge Frances Eccles, struck out Ms K MacKinnon's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
On 15 January 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 22 January 2019, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons record that the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made and no substantive findings on liability are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim in the extracted text. It states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.