Case 4104886/2017 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Ms D Slavkova v Represented by Mr A Angelov Friend Dennis O’Keefe — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104886/2017
- Decision date
- 9 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Ms D Slavkova
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms Slavkova was employed by the first respondent, Dennis O’Keefe, and therefore dismissed the claim against the second respondent, Scarabar Limited. It then held that she had been unfairly constructively dismissed by the first respondent in terms of section 95(1)(c) and section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay £52.50 for underpayment of the national minimum wage and £480 for arrears of pay, both under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also awarded £151.07 for unpaid holiday pay under section 13 ERA 1996 and £271.60 as compensation for unfair dismissal under section 123 ERA 1996, making a total award of £955.17.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly constructively dismissed by the first respondent under section 95(1)(c) and section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Compensation for unfair dismissal was awarded at £271.60 under section 123 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £272 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £52.50 for underpayment of the national minimum wage and £480 for arrears of pay, both recorded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £533 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £151.07 in respect of unpaid holiday pay under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £151 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £955
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £272
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.104 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.123 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.