Case 4104891/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Edward McMahon v RGIS Inventory Specialists Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104891/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Edward McMahon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Edward McMahon resigned on 22 January 2022 giving 10 weeks' notice, with an initial end date of 1 April 2022. After a grievance process, the parties exchanged emails on 24 and 25 February 2022 in which the Claimant agreed to finish early and the Respondent accepted that proposal. The Tribunal found that the written agreement was clear and unambiguous: the employment would end on 28 February 2022, the notice period would end early, holiday pay would be calculated to that date, and pay in lieu of notice would be made up to 1 April 2022.
The Tribunal accepted that 28 February 2022 was the Claimant's last working day. He handed back company property on that date, sent an email to colleagues saying it was his last day, and did no work in March 2022. The Tribunal did not draw an adverse inference from the fact that holiday pay and PILON were paid in the March payroll, accepting evidence that the payroll cut-off meant those sums were finalised after the February payroll run. It also found that the P45 leaving date of 31 March 2022 was incorrect and reflected the date of final payment, not the end of employment.
Applying s.97(1)(a) and s.111(2) ERA 1996, and relying on the principle that an effective date of termination can be brought forward by clear agreement, the Tribunal held that the effective date of termination was 28 February 2022. Because the ET1 was not presented within three months of that date and the Claimant did not contend that it was not reasonably practicable to do so, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction over the unfair dismissal claim and struck it out under Rule 37(1)(a).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that the effective date of termination was 28 February 2022, not 31 March 2022 or 1 April 2022. The ET1 was presented on 30 August 2022, outside the three-month time limit in s.111(2) ERA 1996, and the Claimant did not argue that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- s.97(1)(a) ERA 1996
- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules
- McAlwane v Boughton Estates Ltd
- Stapp v Shaftesbury Soc.
- Dixon v Stenor Ltd.
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.