Case 4104904/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Campbell v Tom Loftus Groundworks Ltd (deceased) — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104904/2017
- Decision date
- 21 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Shona MacLean determined that Mr D Campbell had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered Tom Loftus Groundworks Ltd (deceased) to pay damages of £4,224, calculated on the basis of 12 weeks at £352 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a redundancy payment. That award was assessed at £5,984, calculated as 17 weeks at £352 per week. The hearing listed for 12 January 2018 was cancelled. The judgment records no further remedy findings beyond those two monetary awards, and the combined total is £10,208.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,224, calculated as 12 weeks at £352 per week. | Upheld | — | £4,224 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £5,984, calculated as 17 weeks at £352 per week. | Upheld | — | £5,984 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,208
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.