Mr A McQuillan v Respondent — 2018

Case reference: 4104913/2013
Decision date: 13 July 2018
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Venue: Glasgow

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr A McQuillan

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a short procedural judgment by Employment Judge Frances Eccles sitting in Glasgow. On 27 June 2018 the Tribunal gave Mr A McQuillan an opportunity to provide written reasons by 4 July 2018, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike-out should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore held that the claim had not been actively pursued and struck it out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the merits of the claim and does not award any remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Equal pay	The extracted judgment does not describe the underlying substantive allegations; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.