Case 4104916/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Shields v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104916/2013
- Decision date
- 13 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Shields
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 June 2018 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 4 July 2018 or to request a hearing to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not do so.
Employment Judge Frances Eccles held that no acceptable reason had been given for the claim to remain live and no hearing had been requested. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
The judgment states that the strike-out was made because the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not restate the substantive claim type, but the case listing is under Equal Pay Act and the claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.