Case 4104932/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Ali v British Gas Trading Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104932/2016
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 15 October 2019 to provide written reasons by 29 October 2019, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why strike out should not be ordered and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment text does not set out the factual substance of the claim; classification follows the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment text does not set out the factual substance of the claim; classification follows the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.