Case 4104943/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Buchan v Largs Upholstery Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104943/2018
- Decision date
- 6 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Buchan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent failed to enter a response after the claim form was sent on 1 June 2018. The Employment Judge decided that liability could properly be determined on the available material without a hearing.
The claimant's complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages, described as holiday pay, failure to pay a redundancy payment, and breach of contract for notice pay all succeeded. The tribunal awarded £252 for holiday pay, £1,260 for the redundancy payment, and £840 for notice pay. The redundancy award is shown in the judgment text as '£1,1260' but is also stated to be 6 weeks at £210, which indicates £1,260.
The total amount awarded was £2,352.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as an unauthorised deduction from wages claim relating to holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £252 |
| Redundancy | The judgment text gives the amount as '£1,1260' but also states '(6 weeks x £210)', which indicates £1,260. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal described this as a contract claim for notice pay, calculated as 4 weeks at £210. | Upheld | — | £840 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,352
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.