Case 4104951/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Attenborough v Envirokleen (Scotland) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104951/2018
- Decision date
- 17 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Attenborough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response within the 28-day period after the claim form was sent on 4 June 2018. The Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 21 and decided, on the available material, that liability and remedy could be determined without a hearing.
The claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages, holiday pay, and failure to provide a written statement and employment particulars all succeeded. The judgment records awards of £769.60 for wages deducted without authorisation, £307.84 for outstanding holiday pay, and £769.60 for the written statement/employment particulars complaint, calculated as two weeks at £384.80.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £770 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £308 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written statement and employment particulars; the judgment awards two weeks at £384.80. | Upheld | — | £770 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,847
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.