Case 4104956/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4104956/2018 Mr R Hurson v Represented by: Ms L Beedie - First Employment Law SCARF — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104956/2018
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr Nicol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4104956/2018 Mr R Hurson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Hurson brought claims against SCARF that included age discrimination, pregnancy and maternity discrimination, sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. The judgment records that all claims were withdrawn by the claimant.
Because the claims had been withdrawn, the Employment Tribunal dismissed them under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment contains no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.