Case 4104962/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G A Marr v Balgownie Ltd (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104962/2024
- Decision date
- 20 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O'Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G A Marr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment in which Employment Judge P O'Donnell struck out Mr G A Marr's claim against Balgownie Ltd (In Administration) under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the consent of the administrator nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 5 December 2024 to provide written reasons by 19 December 2024 explaining why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The claim was therefore struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.