Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104963/2024 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on November 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Tracey Ball v Insource Select Limited — Employment Tribunal 2024 | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/Insource Select Limited/4104963/2024

Case 4104963/2024 · Employment Tribunal

ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104963/2024 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on November 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Tracey Ball v Insource Select Limited — 2024

Case reference: 4104963/2024
Decision date: 27 December 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland

Indexed: 30 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104963/2024 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on November 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Tracey Ball

Respondent

Insource Select Limited

Claims brought

1 category

Disability discrimination

Source tags (gov.uk)

Disability Discrimination

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Download judgment (PDF)

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.