Case 4104974/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Allan v Avant Garde FM Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104974/2018
- Decision date
- 5 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge Ian McPherson determined liability on the available material without a hearing, and on 4 July 2018 held that the claimant's complaints succeeded.
The successful complaints were unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, failure to pay notice pay, failure to pay holiday pay, failure to pay arrears of pay, and failure to make other payments, namely expenses owed. The judgment does not give reasons beyond stating that a determination could properly be made on liability without a hearing.
Remedy was not determined in the judgment. The tribunal directed that compensation would be dealt with at a later hearing and ordered the claimant, within 14 days of issue, to provide a detailed schedule of loss setting out the amount of compensation sought and how it had been calculated.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim for redundancy payment succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment lists this as failure to pay notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment lists this as failure to pay holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment lists this as failure to pay arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment lists this as failure to make other payments, namely expenses owed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.