Case 4104975/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104975/2016 Ms D Glen v British Gas-Centrica — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104975/2016
- Decision date
- 6 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104975/2016 Ms D Glen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms D Glen's claim against British Gas/Centrica under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim(s).
The reasons note that on 24 August 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 31 August 2021, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman ordered that the claim be struck out. No remedy, liability finding, or apportionment between claim types is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive complaints individually; it strikes out the claim as a whole under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.