Case 4104976/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104976/2016 Ms E Glen v British Gas-Centrica — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104976/2016
- Decision date
- 6 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104976/2016 Ms E Glen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms E Glen's claim against British Gas/Centrica under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued within the meaning of rule 37(1)(d). On 24 August 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 31 August 2021 or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why the claim should continue and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment complaint and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, relying on rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.