Case 4104977/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wright v Go Green Deliveries Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104977/2022
- Decision date
- 17 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Wright, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or represent itself. The tribunal sat via CVP in Glasgow before Employment Judge L Doherty on 16 November 2022, and reasons were provided orally.
The tribunal upheld Mr Wright's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £961.54. It also upheld a breach of contract claim relating to telephone expenses incurred in the course of employment and awarded £30 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £336.54. The written judgment records only the outcome and awards, and does not set out separate detailed written reasons beyond noting that reasons were given orally.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £961.54. | Upheld | — | £962 |
| Breach of contract | Damages of £30 were awarded in respect of telephone expenses incurred in the course of employment. | Upheld | — | £30 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £336.54. | Upheld | — | £337 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,328
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.