Case 4104996/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104996/2018 Miss Natalia Spychala v Banshee Boudoir Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104996/2018
- Decision date
- 27 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. MacLean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104996/2018 Miss Natalia Spychala
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to Miss Natalia Spychala's claim, so Employment Judge S. MacLean issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Banshee Boudoir Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay £429.38, and it also found a failure to pay holiday entitlement, ordering £125.18.
The tribunal further ordered an uplift of £138.64 for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice and Discipline and Grievance, describing the issue as a failure to take action in response to the claimant's grievances. It also found that the respondent had failed to issue a statement of particulars of employment and ordered £451.68, calculated by reference to average weekly earnings of £129.61. The written judgment does not state a separate total, but the listed sums come to £1,144.88.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £429.38. | Upheld | — | £429 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found a failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £125.18. | Upheld | — | £125 |
| Other | Uplift ordered for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice and Discipline and Grievance, described as failing to take action in response to the claimant's grievances. | Upheld | — | £139 |
| Other | Failure to issue a statement of particulars of employment; the tribunal ordered £451.68 based on average weekly earnings of £129.61. | Upheld | — | £452 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,145
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.